QS Ranking

  • AUB leaps up influential QS World University Rankings for 2016

    In a press release by the American University of Beirut, it said: "The QS World University Rankings for the year 2016/2017 issued on September 6, 2016 show progress on AUB's overall ranking amongst universities worldwide with an increase of 40 positions or spots, making it the university with the most improvement amongst the top 250 ranking universities in the past year. With an overall score of 43.3, AUB ranks 228 amongst universities worldwide, jumping from last year's score of 268."

    Release added: "The improvement in ranking is mainly due to an increase of 18 places in the Academic Reputation indicator (considered the centerpiece of the QS rankings and carrying a weighted score of 40% of the overall performance score) and 21 places in the Student-to-Faculty ratio (weighted at 20%) which evaluates the level of teaching quality through calculating the ratio between two datasets, full time equivalent students per full time equivalent faculty."

    "This significantly improved ranking is a clear testimony of the University's continuous drive for sustaining excellence in teaching, research, and service, and for becoming a premier University not only in the region but worldwide," Interim Provost Mohamed Harajli told us. "The AUB community, including students, faculty, staff, and alumni should feel proud of this remarkable achievement."

    Over 100,000 survey responses were collected by the think tank Quacquarelli Symonds (QS), considering 4,322 universities, with 916 evaluated in one of the most comprehensive and trusted global ranking processes, the only one independently scrutinized and International Ranking Expert Group (IREG) approved.'

    AUB ranks in the top 100 worldwide on two indicators: Employer Reputation (10% of overall score), taking into consideration the reputation of the university amongst employers and the resulting employability of fresh graduates; and International faculty (5% of overall score), assessing success in attracting academics from other nations.

    All the University's figures and indices for the Citations per Faculty category are higher for the year 2016, although AUB's ranking dropped for this category, indicating a rise in research figures across all universities. AUB increased its publishing from less than 500 to over 1,000 papers per year since 2015. AUB ranked 73rd in the world and first in the Arab world in employment reputation.

    "This is a significant evidence of the high quality of the faculty that AUB has and the services that our institution provides to students, the great and relevant education that it offers to its students, and the high caliber of workforce and leaders that it produces and makes available to the local and regional economies and societies," Director of AUB University Libraries, Dr. Lokman Meho told us.

    "I am heartened to learn of the prestigious QS rankings and their affirmation of us as the finest institution of higher learning in Lebanon and among the top 3 in the Arab world," President Fadlo R. Khuri told us.

    "While these rankings by no means can reflect all of the tremendous impact and value that AUB provides for Lebanon, the Arab world, and the international community as a whole, they do serve as affirmation of our continued progress towards being unanimously acclaimed as one of the finest universities in the world."

    Article Source : NNA

  • World University Ranking Methodologies Compared

    apporpe

    Written by Laura Bridgestock for TopUniversities

    There are multiple world university rankings available – with the best-known being the QS World University Rankings®, Times Higher Education World University Rankings, and the Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) – and each one uses a different methodology. This can sometimes be confusing, as it’s not always easy to see why a university is ranked differently, or why the order within a country changes depending on which table you view.

    To clarify how these different outcomes are reached, below is an overview of the methodologies used for these three major world university rankings…

    QS World University Rankings®

    The QS World University Rankings assesses universities on six performance indicators, relating to research, teaching, employability and internationalization. To be eligible for inclusion, institutions must teach at both undergraduate and postgraduate level, and conduct work in at least two of five broad faculty areas (arts and humanities; engineering and technology; social sciences and management; natural sciences; life sciences and medicine).

    1. Academic reputation (worth 40% of the overall score): Based on a global survey of academics, who are asked to identify the leading institutions in their field.
    2. Employer reputation (10%): Based on a global survey of graduate employers, who are asked to identify the institutions producing the best graduates in their sector.
    3. Student-to-faculty ratio (20%): An indication of commitment to high-quality teaching and support.
    4. Research citations per faculty member (20%): This is normalized by subject area, and reflects the impact of an institution’s research.
    5. Proportion of international faculty (5%): A measure of an institution’s success in attracting faculty from overseas.
    6. Proportion of international students (5%): A measure of an institution’s success in attracting students from overseas.
    • The interactive results table can be filtered to show the scores for each of these six indicators, showing where each institution’s comparative strengths and weaknesses lie. You can find out more about the QS World University Rankings methodology here.

    Times Higher Education World University Rankings

    The Times Higher Education World University Rankings uses 13 performance indicators, grouped into five categories. Institutions are excluded if they do not teach at undergraduate level, or if their research output is below a certain threshold.

    1. Teaching (worth 30% of the overall score): Based on a reputation survey (15%), staff-to-student ratio (4.5%), doctorate-to-bachelor’s ratio (2.25%), doctorates-awarded-to-academic-staff ratio (6%) and institutional income (2.25%).
    2. Research (30%): Based on a reputation survey (18%), research income (6%) and research papers published per faculty member (6%).
    3. Research citations (30%): Based on the number of citations a university’s research obtains, normalized by subject area.
    4. International outlook (7.5%): Based on international-to-domestic-student ratio (2.5%), international-to-domestic-staff ratio (2.5%) and international research collaborations (2.5%).
    5. Industry income (2.5%): Based on income earned from industry, relative to the number of academic staff employed, and adjusted for PPP.

    The published results can be sorted to show universities’ scores for each of the five categories, but not for the individual indicators within each category.

    Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU)

    Also widely known as the Shanghai Ranking, the Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) assesses six performance indicators, all relating to research excellence. The ranking considers all institutions with Nobel Laureates, Fields Medalists, highly cited researchers, papers published in Nature or Science, or a significant number of papers indexed by the Science Citation Index-Expanded (SCIE) or Social Science Citation Index (SSCI).

    1. Alumni (worth 10% of the overall score): Based on the number of alumni of an institution who have won Nobel Prizes and Fields Medals, with greater weight given to more recent recipients.
    2. Awards (20%): Based on the number of staff affiliated with an institution who have won Nobel Prizes in physics, chemistry, medicine and economics, and Fields Medals in mathematics, with greater weight given to more recent recipients.
    3. Highly cited researchers (20%): Based on an institution’s number of highly cited researchers, according to the latest list published by Thomson Reuters.
    4. Papers in Nature and Science (20%): Based on the number of papers published in these two influential journals, drawing on a four-year period. For institutions specialized in social sciences and humanities, this category does not apply.
    5. Papers indexed (20%): Based on the number of papers indexed in the Science Citation Index-Expanded and Social Science Citation Index in the preceding calendar year, with a double weighting for papers indexed in the Social Science Citation Index.
    6. Per capita performance (10%): The weighted scores of the other indicators, divided by the number of full-time equivalent academic staff.

    The published ARWU results can be sorted to show performance in each of these six indicators.

Conference & Events

GCC & MENA

HigherEd News

User Access

About Us

Follow Us

×

Sign up to keep in touch!

Be the first to hear about latest News in higher education from ArabiaHighered.

Check out our Privacy Policy & Terms of use
You can unsubscribe from email list at any time